The CLEVER Cities program in London has been a trailblazing force in the active landscape of community engagement since 2018, leading included industrial design and nature-based solutions in South Thamesmead, an area in south-east London. The program, which is run by a group that includes Groundwork London, the Great London Authority, Peabody, and the Young Foundation, navigates the complexities of stakeholder involvement as co-creation develops into cooperative governance. This article explores the crucial role of trust-building in community engagement, drawing insights from the CLEVER Cities initiative and providing crucial tactics for fostering sincere collaboration and overcoming traditional skepticism.
—
Dulcie Ruttley-Dornan and Sean Bradley wrote this article.
Projects in the area of community engagement range in size and duration, from short-term endeavors to continued, multi-year initiatives, and the co-creation component of these can eventually develop into cooperative governance structures. The careful examination of the context and the gathering of stakeholders are essential to the earlier stages of co-creation. As these entities transition from previously top-down, command-and-control methodologies to more laterally organized models, it is crucial to understand the nuances of the core communities and organizations involved in a project.
Interactive processes may be novel in some situations, while previous exposure to development projects and provincial services may have encouraged skepticism or apathy in others. It takes time and a strategic approach to increase community trust and reduce bad perceptions.
The London CLEVER Cities program has been at the forefront of co-developing integrated industrial design and nature-based solutions in South Thamesmead since 2018. This initiative has looked into a variety of ways to involve stakeholders, including thorough project development and extensive open consultations. The program, which is supported by a collaboration between Groundwork London, the Great London Authority, Peabody, and the Young Foundation, has gained priceless experience in community-led design processes and has encountered varying degrees of community receptivity.
More information on the subject: CLEVER Cities: Increasing Urban Resilience Through Community-LedDecision-Making
These encounters have made it clear that developing trust is crucial in all engagement contexts. Consider the following tactics to combat a culture of participation marked by skepticism and lack of trust:
1. Build relationships and get to know your community.
Gain a thorough understanding of the neighborhood, giving the development of relationships priority through the support of neighborhood organizations and active participation in activities.
2.2. Give people opportunities to make a difference.
Show that you are willing to share power by involving all of your stakeholders. Create a setting for first and regular community input and effectively navigate local institutional rigidity.
3. 3. Work openly, with effective feedback and communication
Make sure project information is available and that decision-making procedures are open. Encourage systemic and focused communication by fostering a broad comprehension of the underlying problems. Follow up on stakeholder input with thorough evaluation.
4.. 4. aid in the development of community, skills, and confidence
Boost regional networks by advancing shared objectives. Facilitate the transformation of unstructured cultural groups into related, empowered, and structured entities. Offer chances for the professional team and community members to exchange knowledge.
5. 5. Short victories over mistrust and apathy
Address the previous problems by constantly showing improvement in addressing local issues. Establishing regular milestones for group celebration and a sense of accomplishment is important. Recognize and celebrate rapid victories.
6. 6. Towards a diversity of viewpoints
emphasize the importance of diverse perspectives that are official. Create alliances that include a variety of community experiences.
Although it might not be feasible to use each of these tactics in every project, doing so helps to unite the co-creation team and lessens initial community resistance. Aim for a level of acceptance that enables the community to evaluate the project objectively and without bias.
Understanding and addressing prior experiences becomes crucial in light of common simplistic consultations and projects that falter before implementation. Spend some time learning about the local culture of participation, fixing past mistakes, and developing sincere bonds of trust with the neighborhood. This method makes sure that projects are evaluated based on their potential to significantly improve community members’ quality of life.
You might even be interested in reading: 5 Justifications for Conservation Actions Required to Support Community Livelihoods in the Near Future
—
Regarding the authors:
Dulcie Ruttley, a writer and editor for the not-for-profit sector, has more than five years of experience creating corporate communications and campaigns. Her professional and personal endeavors are both focused on making a good cultural and environmental impact. Volunteering and nature-based solutions are the main themes of Dulcie’s work as effective ways to connect communities and address social and environmental issues. She writes and edits articles, manages cultural media, creates content, and develops websites as part of her portfolio. Dulcie is a devoted climate activist and supporter of transversal feminism. She has led development projects around the world, including those in Nepal and the Caribbean.
Green Urban Designer Sean Bradley  focuses on creating wholesome, socially cohesive neighborhoods that serve as the foundation of future sustainable cities. He oversees the community-based approaches for the collaborative design and implementation of Nature-Based Solutions ( NBS ) that benefit communities and ecosystems. He is the CLEVER Cities Programme Manager for Groundwork London. Resilience Frontiers: Healthy Cities: ( Eco ) systemic Approaches, a UNFCCC program that focuses on creative and transformative solutions essential to the growth of healthy and resilient communities facing the challenges of preparing for and dealing with climate change, includes him as the program’s coordinator for Pathway 6.
