Skip to main content

The government spends a lot of money on tech contracts. Technology or telecoms companies, which offer everything from cloud infrastructure to smart contracts, make up 18 of the UK government’s 40 largest private sector” proper suppliers. ” They are nearly identical to every other sector combined. &nbsp,

In 2020–2021 ( the last shared data ), those 18 companies alone generated more than £5.8 billion in revenue from contracts with the public sector, or 4 % of all funds spent by the government, according to a conservative estimate by research group Tussell. Additionally, the number is increasing annually.

The improvement of digital public services, which rely on a small number of civil servants with the skills and knowledge necessary to run and maintain the main computer systems, is being hampered despite all that investment due to elected officials ‘ lack of technological expertise. &nbsp,

As a result, the UK government’s technological capabilities are slow, outdated, and normally ineffective for those who use online public services at all levels, from Whitehall to nearby councils.

Tech projects are frequently contracted out due to a lack of modern skills at the top, which, according to legislative reports, emphasizes cost minimization over achieving the best results for citizens. &nbsp,

Change begins at the top.

” A Prime Minister who has the belief and cares about having this must be the starting point.” According to Benedict Macon-Cooney, general policy strategist at the Tony Blair Institute think tank, any change to the government’s machinery must begin at its highest level and be its top priority.

He adds that while these groups were able to produce innovative work, it was only because they had been given the support, funding, and freedom to do so by leadership, citing the government’s artificial intelligence ( AI ) and vaccine task forces.

According to Macon-Cooney,” Some of this is about the backgrounds of people before they enter government.” ” You make more money working in technology than you would in politics.”

Because it’s so important to how organizations can succeed, we need to consider how we can help improve the skill level, awareness, and understanding of technology and data among leaders, elected or no.
Jason Kitcat, Business &amp, Trade Department

Only 93 ( 17 % ) of the 541 MPs with higher education degrees who served in the 2015–2017 Parliament had degrees in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) subjects. In fact, according to one count, two-thirds of all degree backgrounds after the most recent election were in six subjects: politics, history, law, economics, philosophy, and English.

While it’s true that MPs are expected to work on numerous briefs across a wide range of topics —not just jobs or topics they are experts in—and nbsp, research conducted in 2021 for the American Politics journal found that STEM-related lawmakers are more likely to be involved in science and technology issues in Parliament.

The majority of elected officials wo n’t be technological experts. They have suppliers and will hear things. At a recent event, Jason Kitcat, director of modern, data, and technology at the Department for Business &amp, Trade, said,” What they need is good advice and not people who just say yes.”

Because it’s so important to how organizations can succeed in the present era, we need to consider how we can help improve the skill level, awareness, and understanding of technology and data among leaders, elected or not.

The risk in this situation, according to a number of the experts Computer Weekly consulted, is that if you view electronic skills as an area of expertise rather than something that is part of everything you do, they will be shunned by small teams and finally have no bearing on your overall decision-making. &nbsp,

” The technology your system runs on, to all intents and purposes, is the service,” is a crucial component for those running services. According to Dave Briggs, who has served as a modern leader at some councils and recently posted on heblog, the two are no longer indistinguishable. ” The days of managers shrugging and claiming,” I do n’t do technology,” or something similar, really ought to be over.”

Building contracting out in

The lack of modern leadership at the top of the government, according to numerous people Computer Weekly spoke with, is having a negative impact on the civil service because it favors expanding its outsourcing business over increasing internal capacity. &nbsp,

One civil servant claimed that because but few people, the majority of whom were secret contractors, knew how to manage IT systems, his department was having trouble doing so.

The Public Accounts Committee and nbsp, ( PAC ), which examined Whitehall’s efforts to transform digitally, recently finalized the A&nBsP report, which highlighted a number of shortcomings with the government’tyrannical tech outsourcing program. &nbsp,

It came to the conclusion that the government and contracts end up “focusing on cost minimization more than best outcome,” labeling the system “inflexible” and accusing departments of failing to “precisely define and scope their requirements.”

The report also discovered that the civil service employs about 4.5 % digital, data, and technology professionals, which is less than half the number required compared to the average private sector employment of 8 to 12 %.

Just 10 of the government’s best 75 services, according to the committee, meet a “great” standard. When compared to how simple they are for people to use and how effectively departments are providing them, about 45 need substantial improvement.

Budget cuts had caused departments to cut back on roles in some cases in addition to failing to hire enough online skilled employees to improve systems. &nbsp,

Meg Hillier, a Labour MP and chair of the PAC, asserts that” the expertise is also concentrated in very few hands, both personally and in the pubic service.” ” We’re not afraid to say on the committee that you occasionally need a consultant or specialist, but you should onboard and ingrain the learning very quickly.” So they do n’t just vanish without a trace.

Just a “handful” of staff at the department know how to handle the computer system that manages the payments, but it was extremely difficult to actually fix errors, Hillier adds, highlighting the current state pension situation where errors in pension payments were consistently missed. She continues,” It is not how a modern system should be operating.” &nbsp,

fundamental problems

Similar to the theory advanced by Mariana Mazzucato and Rosie Collington in their most recent book The Great Con on personal outsourcing and consultancy, the potential risk in this situation is that by obtaining skills from outside sources, institutional knowledge is exceedingly taken away from departments, leaving them unable to carry out fundamental tasks on their own and completely reliant upon private firms. In essence, the government runs the risk of turning into a slave.

There have been attempts to fix this, but they are not perfect. The Central Digital and Data Office was established by the government in 2021 to aid in the Whitehall online revolution. However, the unit has had trouble raising money and gaining notoriety, with one National Audit Office report finding that its” small budget and headcount are already affecting the intended reforms to government core functions ‘ treatment of modern programs.”

In the meantime, in an effort to “deliver modern digital public services,” the Department for Leveling Up, Housing and Communities&nbsp ran an executive education program on modern transformation for local council leaders in March of this year. Although the Amazon-sponsored event avoided discussing the risks associated with excessive procurement, some attendees did emphasize the need for top officials to become familiar with the fundamentals of technology.

Not everyone experiences the same procurement problems. According to Macon-Cooney,” I think we should be really comfortable with procuring this way, in the same way that if you’re building a national airline, you would buy an airplane from Boeing and Airbus more than try to build one yourself.”

The real issue, he claims, is that private companies ‘ participation in government services is currently” a bit piecemeal” and lacks the necessary deep partnerships.

Perhaps a sponsored article in the Financial Times&nbsp by Microsoft, one of the government’s primary digital corporate suppliers, urged Westminster to “equip the public sector with online skills for better government.”

According to those Computer Weekly spoke with, part of the problem is never just a lack of knowledge or will, but also the fundamental makeup of UK politics. &nbsp,

The difficulty is that the type of” slower politics,” as Hillier puts it, required to reform Whitehall takes a long time to implement, must endure, and is frequently funded for years by many administrations. That may seem quite at odds with the brief election cycles and the requirement for observable outcomes that frequently define politics, particularly when an election is approaching.

As Hillier puts it,” No one is going to put it in the manifesto.” No voter will declare,” Oh, yeah, I’m going to vote for them because Whitehall will undergo electronic transformation.”

Leave a Reply